On Tue, Jun 7 2022 at 03:11:41 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
<dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You could say that about any software that we ship that's missing
features. FESCo decided it's better to include an incomplete or
inferior
implementation that we can legally distribute than no implementation
at
all. I don't necessarily agree with that decision (in case of AAC),
but
they're the community-elected body empowered to make such decisions.
Any community member can register themselves as candidate and run for
a
FESCo seat in the next election.
What's wrong with the decision to support AAC? I can play pretty much
any MP4 video on Fedora and it works fine. I understand that
theoretically some videos might have lower audio quality, but I don't
notice or care. Without fdk-aac, almost all MP4 videos would have no
audio at all.
Do I misunderstand something?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure