Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:16 PM Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Fedora uses 'BSD' for a variety of licenses, many of which have specific
> SPDX identifiers. MIT and BSD are the most common problem areas for this
> situation.

Right, but BSD is not in SPDX, it may be BSD-2-Clause
(or BSD-3-Clause....).  If I see BSD, I know it is a (legacy)
Fedora id, and if it is BSD-2-Clause it should be SPDX.

MIT is the case I am aware of where it is both a (legacy)
Fedora id, and a valid SPDX id, but can refer to different
underlying license terms.

I am not saying that one can convert from Fedora BSD
to SPDX BSD-n-clause without examination (work!), but
if it has been converted it is obvious from the id being
used (well, except for MIT, and ???? others?)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux