On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:25:40 AM CDT Neal Gompa wrote: > At least in the MIT license case, the MIT identifier exists there. One > reason Tom Callaway resisted changing to SPDX in the past was that > they never resolved the problem with the MIT identifier. It's > effectively a family identifier, just like in Fedora. The difference > is that some MIT license variants got separate identifiers, but not > all. My understanding is that `SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT` specifically refers to the MIT/Expat license, whose text is available on the SPDX `MIT` license page[1]. SPDX already has a couple distinct MIT license variant identifiers that we don't have. [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
