On Thursday, May 26, 2022 9:14:14 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote: > Does a marker of the conversion need to be visible in the binary packages? I think it should be. According to the Change Proposal, "the use of a standardized identifier for license will align Fedora with other distributions. And allows efficient and reliable identification of licenses." If we want to effectively accomplish the second goal, we should try to make the license identifiers *less* ambiguous than before. In order to do that, I think the RPMs we distribute should clearly state whether they have been converted to use SPDX identifiers. -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
