A ter, 10-05-2022 às 10:22 +0200, Vít Ondruch escreveu: > Ok, now I see commits such as: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/c/70ecae14df6b89cbd269778fc6808eb6e51e141e?branch=rawhide > > which is awful that we need something like this. But @Neal, wouldn't > it > be better if your `ffmpeg_gen_free_tarball.sh` simply updated the > hashes > in `sources` file? The `fedpkg new-sources --offline` could help with > that I guess. +1 @Neal I think you can solve your problem with: fedpkg new-sources --offline ffmpeg-free-5.0.1.tar.xz --offline is yet another feature, but what is asking here is the opposite, is the old behavior, `fedpkg srpm` download all sources in sources files, even if they aren't use anymore, which I don't see in what can be useful . Best regards > Vít > > > Dne 10. 05. 22 v 10:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > I somehow don't understand why there should be anything like > > "unused > > source files". Why is something like this even possible? It seems > > strange that this was not questioned originally and it seems still > > strange nobody questions this in this thread. > > > > > > Vít > > > > > > Dne 04. 05. 22 v 17:01 Ondrej Nosek napsal(a): > > > Hi all, > > > > > > A few months ago fedpkg introduced a change which avoids > > > downloading > > > source files (from dist-git) that are not used in the specfile > > > and > > > therefore downloading them would be wasting of resources and > > > time. > > > The original request was opened here [1] and implemented here > > > [2]. > > > The logic is part of the command "fedpkg sources" and currently > > > can't > > > be disabled manually. The logic parses specfile, but doesn't do a > > > deep analysis, so it is doesn't always right. > > > > > > Recently we got a request for opt-in implementation of this. It > > > means > > > you should actively use some argument (ie. --skip-unused) to > > > avoid > > > downloading unused sources. The requestor points out that it > > > broke > > > the original functionality and it is not possible to add any > > > extra > > > arguments into the complicated release process (RHEL kernel). > > > > > > On the other hand, opt-out (--download-unused) has (I think) a > > > significantly higher impact on saving resources (time and network > > > capacity). Of course, it doesn't have to be implemented as an > > > extra > > > argument, there might be a different (maybe not so clean) > > > solution > > > for such projects. > > > > > > What do you think about it? > > > > > > I added into a loop (bcc) names who already were involved in this > > > in > > > a past (on the Fedora devel mailing list) > > > > > > Thanks, Ondrej > > > > > > [1] https://pagure.io/rpkg/issue/559 > > > [2] https://pagure.io/rpkg/pull-request/564 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
