On 5/10/22 02:05, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > On 10/05/2022 03:12, Dusty Mabe wrote: > >> Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream >> discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for >> bond and bridge devices. >> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047893.html >> >> A few of us were originally going to propose a change to Fedora to change >> the current behavior back, but it was suggested we take the discussion >> upstream to hash out the merits there. > > All I can say is, no, just leave it alone. > > Having fixed all my machines two years ago when it stopped generating > persistent addresses I have just spent this weekend doing it again now > that F36 has gone back to them. I'm not aware of any change in behavior in F36, but maybe I missed something. > > I don't care what address my bridges have, so long as it is fixed so > that DHCP can allocate addresses against it, but I do prefer not to > have to fix all my DHCP and DNS every time the policy flip flops and > upgrades break my networks! > With the current policy you'll get a new MAC every time you re-install a machine. Is that what you want? The upstream proposal is to make it based on the actual MAC of the NIC(s) again. Dusty _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
