Re: upstream systemd discussion about MACAddressPolicy for bonds and bridges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/05/2022 03:12, Dusty Mabe wrote:

Just wanted to point interested people in the direction of an upstream
discussion about how (by default) the MAC address should get set for
bond and bridge devices.

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-May/047893.html

A few of us were originally going to propose a change to Fedora to change
the current behavior back, but it was suggested we take the discussion
upstream to hash out the merits there.

All I can say is, no, just leave it alone.

Having fixed all my machines two years ago when it stopped generating
persistent addresses I have just spent this weekend doing it again now
that F36 has gone back to them.

I don't care what address my bridges have, so long as it is fixed so
that DHCP can allocate addresses against it, but I do prefer not to
have to fix all my DHCP and DNS every time the policy flip flops and
upgrades break my networks!

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux