Once upon a time, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx> said: > In a similar (parallel) discussion related to future RHEL, it has been > found this change also breaks resolution of many DNSSEC-secured domains > which are still using SHA1 signatures. It is impossible to know how long it > will be before those domains upgrade to better signatures, and at the > moment it's rather challenging for resolvers to be able to determine that > the resolution failure was caused by local policy instead of an actual > invalid signature. That's a really unacceptable break, and will just lead to people saying "don't use Red Hat stuff for DNS servers". If the public open-resolvers (Google, Cloudflare, etc.) accept it, then it needs to continue to work on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
