On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 7:08 PM Gabriel Ramirez <gabrielo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/10/22 16:10, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote: > >> [...] > >>> Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad > >>> experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1 > >>> system that works fine with UEFI. And my parents' laptop was purchased > >>> 2 years ago and the UEFI firmware does not allow to boot anything > >>> other than Windows on UEFI mode (regardless of turning secure boot on > >>> or off) and I have to switch to BIOS mode to make Fedora work there. > >>> So in this situation, I think it's way too aggressive to accept the > >>> change - this will probably drive away some potential new users with > >>> decent laptop like my parents'. > >> Have you tried renaming your Fedora boot entry to "Windows Boot > >> Manager"? I have one Sony laptop that boots only the boot entry with > >> that exact name. > >> > > I wonder if this would work with one of my old machines too. I've > > never thought to rename the boot entry in the firmware before... > > > > > > about "Windows Boot Manager" efi entry required to boot: > https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html > > the above happens too with the lenovo thinkcentre m91
