On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 4:37 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Friday, 08 April 2022 at 16:14, Zamir SUN wrote: > [...] > > Probably it isn't a problem for some users, but I'm still having bad > > experience with UEFI on x86_64 now. Out of my 3 machines I only have 1 > > system that works fine with UEFI. And my parents' laptop was purchased > > 2 years ago and the UEFI firmware does not allow to boot anything > > other than Windows on UEFI mode (regardless of turning secure boot on > > or off) and I have to switch to BIOS mode to make Fedora work there. > > So in this situation, I think it's way too aggressive to accept the > > change - this will probably drive away some potential new users with > > decent laptop like my parents'. > > Have you tried renaming your Fedora boot entry to "Windows Boot > Manager"? I have one Sony laptop that boots only the boot entry with > that exact name. > I wonder if this would work with one of my old machines too. I've never thought to rename the boot entry in the firmware before... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
