Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 4/6/22 06:43, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:04 AM Gary Buhrmaster >> <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:59 AM Demi Marie Obenour >>> <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote: >>>>> We either want users with NVIDIA hardware to be inside the Secure Boot >>>>> fold or we don't. I want them in the fold *despite* the driver that >>>>> needs signing is proprietary. That's a better user experience across >>>>> the board, including the security messaging is made consistent. The >>>>> existing policy serves no good at all and is double talk. If we really >>>>> care about security more than ideological worry, we'd sign the driver. >>>> >>>> I agree with this. Sign the driver. >>> >>> Nvidia has their driver signed for their >>> Windows drivers. That they choose >>> not to do so for Linux is their right, >>> even if some wish they did. >>> >>> It should be noted that while many >>> might wish nvidia chose a different >>> way, that is completely orthogonal >>> to bios vs uefi. >> >> Linux, like Windows, requires the distribution vendor to sign modules >> for automatic trust. There are a number of complicated issues that >> make it difficult for us to sign this particular driver, though. >> Notably, NVIDIA themselves acknowledges that it infringes on the GPL >> to redistribute built kernel module blobs of nvidia.ko[1], so that means >> any method of signing it needs to be done locally, which means we >> *need* the local signing path to be improved. >> >> [1]: https://imgur.com/LUCQ3WW > > Can we get NVIDIA to make the module build reproducible? If so, we > could distribute a detached signature. nvidia's module is proprietary. Be well, --Robbie
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure