On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 12:59 AM Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/5/22 19:38, Chris Murphy wrote: > > We either want users with NVIDIA hardware to be inside the Secure Boot > > fold or we don't. I want them in the fold *despite* the driver that > > needs signing is proprietary. That's a better user experience across > > the board, including the security messaging is made consistent. The > > existing policy serves no good at all and is double talk. If we really > > care about security more than ideological worry, we'd sign the driver. > > I agree with this. Sign the driver. Nvidia has their driver signed for their Windows drivers. That they choose not to do so for Linux is their right, even if some wish they did. It should be noted that while many might wish nvidia chose a different way, that is completely orthogonal to bios vs uefi. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
