On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 11:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On the first part: yes, there's a long, slow sunset, but I think > realistically we're going to see business-side attention drop significantly, > and we'll have correspondingly worse and worse service. Right now, there are > basically only two people keeping it all going, which is heroic. I don't > think it's too much pulling-back-the-corporate-curtain to guess that if one > or both get tired of that and decide to go start a yak farm, Red Hat won't > prioritize hiring backfill dedicated in the same way. There is one thing I worry about here - and maybe we need to take this up internally within Red Hat, but whatever - I strongly believe that *at a minimum*, going to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=NNN should show you the report, comments, and attachments for bug NNN. *Forever*. RH Bugzilla is effectively a huge, 20-year long knowledge base at this point. Probably hundreds of thousands of places on the internet link to RH bugs. Taking that offline would be effectively an act of vandalism. It may not need to keep actually working as a dynamic web app if we do retire BZ - we could reduce it to a server that just serves up static snapshots of the content - but I'd really hate to see the content lost. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
