On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 16:17 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > In resume glib still required for 20 packages [1], > apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of > these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ? > > Thanks > > alsa-tools (maintained by: perex, timj) > alsa-tools-1.2.5-3.fc36.src requires gtk+-devel = 1:1.2.10-98.fc36 > alsa-tools-firmware-1.2.5-3.fc36.x86_64 requires alsa-firmware = 1.2.4- > 6.fc36 > > alsa-firmware (maintained by: perex, timj) > alsa-firmware-1.2.4-6.fc36.noarch requires alsa-tools-firmware = 1.2.5- > 3.fc36 These two seem like they would need addressing. Presumably we could drop some graphical thing from alsa-tools and keep the rest. > > fvwm (maintained by: jhogarth, mcermak, pertusus, peter) > fvwm-2.6.9-7.fc36.src requires libstroke-devel = 0.5.1-45.fc36 > fvwm-2.6.9-7.fc36.x86_64 requires libstroke.so.0()(64bit) At least *somebody* was using fvwm as recently as F34: https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/ounk85/f34_ive_been_trying_different_wm_and_at_the/ so I guess we might care about them? There appears to be an vfwm3: https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm3 with tagged 1.0.x releases, but I've no idea how usable/popular/packageable that is. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
