Re: Let's retire original glib and gtk+ (new report)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:29 AM Michael Catanzaro  wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7 2022 at 04:17:09 PM +0000, Sérgio Basto
 
> Hi,
> In resume glib still required for 20 packages  [1],
> apart of the sweet memories that some package bring to us , any of
> these packages is needed ? or haven't replacement ?

The maintainer is unwilling to retire them.

I think we should ask FESCo to force them to be retired. It's confusing
to have ancient versions of the packages in the distro, and they will
stick around forever if not

Instead of forcing a mandate to remove it, perhaps a migration to Copr would be a better way out of this

Rahul 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux