Re: Looking for %{forgemeta} GitHub example

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 4:00 PM PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > especially since they don't really provide value for
> > standard GitHub tarball downloads etc. compared to the "old" SourceURL
>
> some of us strongly disagree.  admittedly, with no weight ...

Admittedly, packages like the .spec for nginx you linked are very far
outliers regarding package complexity.
I doubt there's many packages that need to reference *that* many
different source repos and tarballs ...

For these really complex cases, the forge macros are ~fine~, I guess.
But you really don't - and shouldn't - need to rely on hundreds of
lines of complex lua macros to be able to specify one or two GitHub
tarballs.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux