Il 21/02/22 22:09, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > Hi! > I would recommend that you use the standard source handling as > documented on the SourceURL page. > The forge macros are no longer actively maintained or developed, the > last fix / update they received was almost two years ago. > The original author is no longer contributing to Fedora, and nobody > else seems to understand how the lua scripts behind those macros work. > So, shall we remove the reference to %forgemeta macros from the Packaging Guidelines? I'd like to have only one recommended way to make things listed in PG. Having more is confusing for new packagers (and experienced also). The same applies for %autorelease and %autochangelog. Either recommend the use of them or not, instead of saying "pick what you like". It seems to me that these two were adopted in a hurry, but now the development has almost stopped... Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
