On Di, 22.02.22 18:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Clarification: it *is* a bug *if* the unit that is ordered after it is > ordered before the default boot target. So e.g. something that is started > at boot but does not delay the default boot target is not a problem. Indeed. > > > The DNF thing looks like an obvious bug to me. DNF's cache logic > > > really shouldn't add an expensive sync point to the boot like > > > this. Someone should file a bug to ask them to remove that. > > No, no. dnf-makecache.timer is "asynchronous" — it is not part of > multi-user.target. It is reasonable to order it after network is up > because this way it can just do its thing without spurious noise about > failed connections. OK, I think this is indeed OK, then. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
