On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 10:35 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Definitely. I have long said that any time there's a scriptlet in an > RPM package, we should work towards removing it. > > BTW I found this F31 change proposal. Did it happen? The bug was > CLOSED/CURRENTRELEASE. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LimitScriptletUsage > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754666 > Didn't have enough resources, so got dropped. Some upstream code/data is here: https://github.com/james-antill/scriptlets-monitor https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JamesAntill/ScriptletUsage https://github.com/james-antill/combined ...and a couple of things went into the distro. IIRC the rough thoughts/conclusions, at the time, was that the big win was when you could get a complete install done without any scriptlets and it should be possible to get a bunch of the small cases to that win state (@minimal, base image). Maybe get @server a release or two later. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
