On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:57 AM David Sommerseth <dazo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 27/01/2022 15:50, Neal Gompa wrote: > > pkcs11-helper doesn't exist in RHEL/CentOS itself, and it's probably > > being filtered out in ELN to mimic RHEL. It's shipped in EPEL, so you > > need an EPEL repository. > > Alright, sounds reasonable. > > > > > ELN won't be very useful for you because it's a stripped compose, > > unless you rebuild pkcs11-helper for ELN in your Copr. > > That's an option, I'll consider that. > > > I'm also saying that having both the epel-* chroots enabled and the > > centos-* chroots enabled is a bit redundant. If you need stuff from > > EPEL, just use the EPEL chroots, which are built on CentOS/RHEL. > > My understanding is that CentOS Stream is more bleeding edge than the > standard CentOS/RHEL releases, so dependencies might not be correct for > Stream users. Or maybe I'm overthinking this and I don't need to have > special builds for CentOS Stream? > > To be clear, to me there is a difference between EPEL builds (targetting > the traditional CentOS/RHEL distros) > and CentOS Stream. But again, I > might have misunderstood these concepts. > It's not exactly bleeding edge, it's more like the in-between state of point releases. But there is also the epel-next-* chroots that are specifically layered on CentOS Stream. You want those alongside the regular EPEL ones. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
