Dne 26. 01. 22 v 15:48 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:More issues with this change: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246 Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build stage is injected, and basically extensions are broken. I consider this a bug in rpm-config-macros. If later-non-valid flags are requiredI meant redhat-rpm-config, apologies.
This is basically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092. I'd suggest to build R and similar with:
~~~ %undefine _package_note_file ~~~as a quick workaround and find better solution later. E.g. there is this proposal for Ruby:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284684#c14 Vít
Iñakifor this change, then they should be injected via some private variable in order to keep %{build_*flags} clean. Iñaki On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 16:21, Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55:On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It broke multiple packages at the linking stage: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178 On the package-note repo https://github.com/systemd/package-notes it is said that it requires binutils (>= 2.38) but it hasn't been released yet. Can the owners of this change chime in?I would appreciate any insights that can be offered into why the frama-c build is failing: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81690392 It's got something to do with this change, since the linker is complaining that it cannot find the package-note file, but I am unclear how this change is supposed to interact with the OCaml ecosystem.Hi, the problem was that the %_package_note_file macro uses %buildsubdir, and %buildsubdir is set during %prep, but it seems it only available during %build and later. So the path was set wrong… I pushed a work-around to set %_package_note_file directly before prep and started a new build. (I wish we had something better for this. %buildsubdir is useful, but very fragile.)Well, it turned up that this issue (that %buildsubdir is unusable in %prep) also affects gabedit as: /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-gabedit-2.5.1-11.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/gabedit?collection=f36 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81664083 Can't this issue be fixed in package-notes rpm side? Regards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure-- Iñaki Úcar
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
