On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > More issues with this change: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246 > > Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the > build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With > this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build > stage is injected, and basically extensions are broken. I consider > this a bug in rpm-config-macros. If later-non-valid flags are required I meant redhat-rpm-config, apologies. Iñaki > for this change, then they should be injected via some private > variable in order to keep %{build_*flags} clean. > > Iñaki > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 16:21, Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55: > > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It > > >>> broke multiple packages at the linking stage: > > >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178 > > >>> > > >>> On the package-note repo https://github.com/systemd/package-notes > > >>> it is said that it requires binutils (>= 2.38) but it hasn't been > > >>> released yet. > > >>> > > >>> Can the owners of this change chime in? > > >> > > >> I would appreciate any insights that can be offered into why the > > >> frama-c build is failing: > > >> > > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81690392 > > >> > > >> It's got something to do with this change, since the linker is > > >> complaining that it cannot find the package-note file, but I am > > >> unclear how this change is supposed to interact with the OCaml > > >> ecosystem. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the problem was that the %_package_note_file macro uses %buildsubdir, > > > and %buildsubdir is set during %prep, but it seems it only available > > > during %build and later. So the path was set wrong… I pushed a work-around > > > to set %_package_note_file directly before prep and started a new build. > > > > > > (I wish we had something better for this. %buildsubdir is useful, but > > > very fragile.) > > > > Well, it turned up that this issue (that %buildsubdir is unusable in %prep) > > also affects gabedit as: > > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-gabedit-2.5.1-11.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/gabedit?collection=f36 > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81664083 > > > > Can't this issue be fixed in package-notes rpm side? > > > > Regards, > > Mamoru > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
