Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It
> broke multiple packages at the linking stage:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043178
>
> On the package-note repo https://github.com/systemd/package-notes
> it is said that it requires binutils (>= 2.38) but it hasn't been
> released yet.
>
> Can the owners of this change chime in?

I would appreciate any insights that can be offered into why the
frama-c build is failing:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81690392

It's got something to do with this change, since the linker is
complaining that it cannot find the package-note file, but I am
unclear how this change is supposed to interact with the OCaml
ecosystem.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux