On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 15:41 +0530, Anoop C S via devel wrote: > On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote: > > > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > > > > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email > > > > asking > > > > them to > > > > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email > > > > address in FAS > > > > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > > > > > > > Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Bugzilla_Account > > > > > > > > - anoopcs contacted since November 27th > > > > > > > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/glusterfs > > > > anoopcs is main admin of rpms/glusterfs-coreutils > > > > anoopcs has a bugzilla override on rpms/glusterfs-coreutils > > > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/richacl > > > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/samba > > > > anoopcs is watching rpms/socket_wrapper > > > > > > I am aware and was ignoring it based on the reply I got for the > > > ticket > > > raised[1] on the exact same issue. I also wanted to know where > > > the > > > ongoing work for making use of bugzilla field in FAS(I made > > > another > > > comment after ticket got closed) is being tracked. May be issue > > > #9863[2]? > > > > That's a question I do not have the answer to. > > > > Fine. I'll keep an eye on #9863 for now. > > > > Very recent request(via email) for bugzilla email validation gave > > > me an > > > impression that its finally gonna happen. > > > > It is being worked on but it is not ready yet (I expect that it > > will > > be > > announced once it is). > > > > > If not, how important it is to match both(FAS and bugzilla) email > > > addresses at this point? Or is it a requirement now to have same > > > email > > > address to get the work completed? Sorry, I am little confused. > > > > It is important as it breaks the sync from dist-git to bugzilla and > > for the > > entire component (package), so it impacts you as well as > > potentially > > any other > > co-maintainers or watchers of the packages you are linked to. > > > > Currently there are two ways to get this sync working: > > - either have a valid bugzilla account corresponding to your main > > FAS > > email > > May be not. > > > - add an override to manually map your main FAS email to your > > bugzilla account > > in: > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/main/f/roles/openshift-apps/toddlers/templates/email_overrides.toml > > Ahaa..for the time being, I'll go for an email override. In that case > I hope a ticket is expected? PR #934[1] is up for review. Let me know if something else is required. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/934 Thanks, Anoop C S. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
