Re: Non-responsive packagers: anoopcs, gtiwari, msehnout, sebix, vanessa_kris

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-01-21 at 10:32 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 02:31:57PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning Everyone,
> > > 
> > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email
> > > asking
> > > them to
> > > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email
> > > address in FAS
> > > matches an existing bugzilla account.
> > > 
> > > Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Bugzilla_Account
> > > 
> > > - anoopcs contacted since November 27th
> > > 
> > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/glusterfs
> > > anoopcs is main admin of rpms/glusterfs-coreutils
> > > anoopcs has a bugzilla override on rpms/glusterfs-coreutils
> > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/richacl
> > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/samba
> > > anoopcs is watching rpms/socket_wrapper
> > 
> > I am aware and was ignoring it based on the reply I got for the
> > ticket
> > raised[1] on the exact same issue. I also wanted to know where the
> > ongoing work for making use of bugzilla field in FAS(I made another
> > comment after ticket got closed) is being tracked. May be issue
> > #9863[2]?
> 
> That's a question I do not have the answer to.
> 

Fine. I'll keep an eye on #9863 for now.

> > Very recent request(via email) for bugzilla email validation gave
> > me an
> > impression that its finally gonna happen.
> 
> It is being worked on but it is not ready yet (I expect that it will
> be
> announced once it is).
> 
> > If not, how important it is to match both(FAS and bugzilla) email
> > addresses at this point? Or is it a requirement now to have same
> > email
> > address to get the work completed? Sorry, I am little confused.
> 
> It is important as it breaks the sync from dist-git to bugzilla and
> for the
> entire component (package), so it impacts you as well as potentially
> any other
> co-maintainers or watchers of the packages you are linked to.
> 
> Currently there are two ways to get this sync working:
> - either have a valid bugzilla account corresponding to your main FAS
> email

May be not.

> - add an override to manually map your main FAS email to your
> bugzilla account
>   in:
>  
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/blob/main/f/roles/openshift-apps/toddlers/templates/email_overrides.toml

Ahaa..for the time being, I'll go for an email override. In that case I
hope a ticket is expected?

Thanks for the pointers.

-Anoop C S.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux