On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 09:57 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > The packagers listed here have been receiving a daily email asking > them to > either adjust their bugzilla or their FAS account so the email > address in FAS > matches an existing bugzilla account. > > Having a bugzilla account is mandatory per: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Bugzilla_Account > > - anoopcs contacted since November 27th > > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/glusterfs > anoopcs is main admin of rpms/glusterfs-coreutils > anoopcs has a bugzilla override on rpms/glusterfs-coreutils > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/richacl > anoopcs is maintainer of rpms/samba > anoopcs is watching rpms/socket_wrapper I am aware and was ignoring it based on the reply I got for the ticket raised[1] on the exact same issue. I also wanted to know where the ongoing work for making use of bugzilla field in FAS(I made another comment after ticket got closed) is being tracked. May be issue #9863[2]? Very recent request(via email) for bugzilla email validation gave me an impression that its finally gonna happen. If not, how important it is to match both(FAS and bugzilla) email addresses at this point? Or is it a requirement now to have same email address to get the work completed? Sorry, I am little confused. Regards, Anoop C S. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10404 [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9863 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
