On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 08:31:05AM +0200, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > Thank you, this is great! > > Those two seem to contradict each other: > > # If you are a new packager seeking sponsorship via new package or reviews > # please close this > > and > > # If you are a new packager seeking sponsorship after your new package > submission > # was approved, please note the link to that review and your background here > # for sponsors to review. Well, the first was intended to tell people to first get a package approved before filing a ticket. Otherwise they would file the sponsorship ticket before they even filed a review or before it's approved and then the ticket would have to wait and clog up the tracker. > For the re-reviewing of orphaned packages, I opened a FESCo ticket [1] so it > can be properly added to relevant policies, or have the decision logged that > those should not be required. > > [1]: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2734 ok. I'll comment there. Thanks for helping document all this better! kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
