On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:59 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think these packages are wrong upstream. The `sphinxcontrib` > directory is provided by python3-sphinx, and it specifically doesn't > have `__init__.py` there. Those extensions should not be adding one, > so as to keep the implicit namespace package nature of that directory: > https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#native-namespace-packages > > By the contents of the files, it appears they are trying to force it > to be a pkg_resources-style namespace package: > https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#pkg-resources-style-namespace-packages > > But since Sphinx didn't do that in the first place, there's no > guarantee that other packages will contain `__init__.py` (and indeed > most do not). Thank you, Elliott. That's good information. I will talk to the respective upstreams about this. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
