RE: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel [mailto:devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2021 12:18 PM
> On 29/12/2021 15:20, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote:
> > The TPM has a fundamental advantage, compared to other
> > mechanisms. It is tamperproof, it often receives high-grade
> > certifications, and it is one of the few components that you
> > could rely on to protect your sensitive data in the event your
> > host becomes compromised.
> 
> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/08/how-to-go-from-stolen-pc-to-
> network-intrusion-in-30-minutes/

If I understood the article correctly, the communication was
spoofed due to not using the encrypted session feature of
the TPM. The TPM also supports protection against tampering
of the communication with the HMAC session.

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Zhong Ronghua
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux