Re: F36 Change: DIGLIM (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 06:38 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> With Windows 11, they're *mandatory*. Corporate policies now
> effectively *require* TPM-based mechanisms *in addition* to classical
> password or token-based multi-factor authentication.
This certainly is not any reason to adopt this for Fedora. So far in my
life with TPM, it has been an annoyance that I find refreshing not to
have to even contemplate with my Fedora Linux installation. 
I see no benefit for the Fedora Community and the Fedora Project it
supports to follow the lead of the proprietary driven objectives. The
only obvious one that comes to mind is the recent announcements of it's
inclusion on traditionally proprietary OS vendor supplied hardware.
This wreaks of "for profit" motivation.

Just my opinion on what I am reading here in the comments.

Regards,
Stephen Snow
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux