Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Vít Ondruch:

> Or maybe I just don't understand how the side-tag is going to be
> used. Will there be some modifications necessary for some packages
> (except those already listed)?

The modifications can go directly into rawhide because they are
compatible with older compilers.  But at least in the beginning, I plan
to submit them just to upstream, hoping that the Fedora package gets
rebase to an upstream release with the fix before the switch to GCC 13.

> Will these changes be compatible with rawhide? Will the side-tag ever
> be merged back into Rawhide?

The side tag will not be merged back.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux