Re: Long-running side tag for porting Fedora to C99 (no implicit decls)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Kevin Fenzi:

> Isn't this an ideal use case for copr?

I don't know.  I could piece together the Koji API fairly easily, and
had hoped to reuse some of the script logic.

Or does COPR have direct support this?  Can I tell it directly to report
rawhide in a special buildroot?  Is there a programmatic way to access
the resulting log files?

(I won't need the built RPMs, which is why I would use scratch builds in
Koji.)

> Or is the lack of s390x (and non emulated armv7) there too much of a hurdle?

I would prefer to test on the real thing, true.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux