Re: F36 Change: Retired Packages (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07. 10. 21 17:45, Ben Cotton wrote:
* We suggest users to remove packages that are no longer maintained
and may contain security vulnerabilities.

This makes perfect sense.

* We make sure that archaic packages do not break upgrade between two
versions of Fedora.

When are you supposed to run remove-retired-packages?

If you run remove-retired-packages after the upgrade, you already managed to upgrade and nothing is broken, no?

If you run remove-retired-packages before the upgrade, it might remove something that will be correctly obsoleted and provided by a replacement package that offers the same functionality under a different package name.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux