On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 27.09.2021 um 10:47 schrieb Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 21:20:07 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> Should the @java-maint-sig group be removed from any packages it is > >> still associated with? Should it be dissolved, and members be removed? > >> Should the remaining ruins that used to be packages be orphaned? > >> Retired? Buried? Forgotten? > >> > >> I don't know. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I think removing the java-maint-sig is the only thing to > > do. As heart-breaking as it is, I agree with Ankur. Letting things as they are is not correct. The group itself will not disappear, so if some people wanted to revive it some time in the future, they could still do, but it would not give the impression that someone/some team is looking after packages while they are not. > What do you want to gain from it? What is the goal to be? I believe the original email from Fabio answers both of these questions. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
