Re: [Forged Sender] Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers - ant-contrib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/24/21 7:24 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life



Depending on: ant-contrib (6), status change: 2021-07-26 (4 weeks ago)



	eclipse-gef (maintained by: eclipse-sig, mbooth, orphan, rgrunber)



		eclipse-gef-3.11.0-16.fc34.src requires ant-contrib = 1.0-0.40.b3.fc34







	forbidden-apis (maintained by: jvanek, zzambers)



		forbidden-apis-2.5-10.fc34.src requires ant-contrib = 1.0-0.40.b3.fc34







	java-sleep (maintained by: orion)



		java-sleep-2.1-23.fc35.src requires ant-contrib = 1.0-0.40.b3.fc34







	eclipse-subclipse (maintained by: eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth, orphan)



eclipse-subclipse-4.3.3-2.fc34.noarch requires osgi(org.eclipse.draw2d) = 3.10.100.202102041646, osgi(org.eclipse.gef) = 3.11.0.202102041646



		eclipse-subclipse-4.3.3-2.fc34.src requires eclipse-gef = 3.11.0-16.fc34







	eclipse-webtools (maintained by: eclipse-sig, galileo, mbooth, orphan)



		eclipse-webtools-3.21.0-1.fc35.src requires eclipse-gef = 3.11.0-16.fc34



eclipse-webtools-common-3.21.0-1.fc35.noarch requires eclipse-gef = 3.11.0-16.fc34, osgi(org.eclipse.gef) = 3.11.0.202102041646



eclipse-webtools-sourceediting-3.21.0-1.fc35.noarch requires osgi(org.eclipse.gef) = 3.11.0.202102041646







	moconti (maintained by: orion)



		moconti-102609-20.fc35.noarch requires java-sleep = 2.1-23.fc35



		moconti-102609-20.fc35.src requires java-sleep = 2.1-23.fc35




ant-contrib is ancient and probably should just be retired. I've retired java-sleep -> moconti which are dead upstream. Nothing appears to use forbidden-apis so that can likely go as well without trouble.

eclipse-gef is FTBFS for other reasons so it's hard to tell, but I suspect that it doesn't really depend on ant-contrib at all at this point either despite having a dep still listing in a pom.xml file.

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems          720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux