On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 07:55:17AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Kevin Fenzi: > >> > >> > Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB > >> > memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see > >> > 40GB memory), but this causes > >> > > >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183 > >> > > >> > basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts the > >> > build, which kills kojid, etc... > >> > >> Why aren't the builders running 64-bit kernels, like we do for x86-64? > > > > This is not a configuration that I think we support in any way. > > Who is “we”? The Fedora Project? Do we have any kind of documentation on how to install or set this up? Does anyone test it? If I ask questions or have problems with it, will anyone be able to answer? I think the answers are: no, no, no. > I expect that 64-bit kernel bugs will get more attention upstream. I'm sure. > > At least rpm rejects trying to install a aarch64 kernel on a 32bit > > userspace. > > The host (including kojid) should probably be 64-bit, and only the > chroot 32-bit. If that doesn't work, it's an RPM bug/missing feature. Sure, but that doesn't help me much right now. Anyhow, will talk to arm folks and see what they suggest... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure