Re: Any recent changes to the arm builders?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:51:16PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi:
> 
> > Yes. They were mistakenly running the normal kernel (so they had ~3GB
> > memory available). I moved them back to the lpae kernel (so they see
> > 40GB memory), but this causes 
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1920183
> >
> > basically OOM kills kojid, which restarts kojid, which restarts the
> > build, which kills kojid, etc... 
> 
> Why aren't the builders running 64-bit kernels, like we do for x86-64?

This is not a configuration that I think we support in any way. 

At least rpm rejects trying to install a aarch64 kernel on a 32bit
userspace. 

> As far as I understand it, there is both kernel and CPU support for that
> (on CPUs that support 32-bit at all).

If it can be made to work that would be great, but my understanding is
that it does not.

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux