On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 17:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > > What would be considered sufficient research about usage of guile? If > > package provides it as optional feature among many other features, how > > should package owner test one feature is still demanded? Do we have any > > best practice? Is asking on users@ and devel@ list enough? > > I strongly suspect that those users would have made themselves known > by now. Neal mentioned that he uses guile in some projects, and that's > pretty much it so far. > Has anyone tried to contact Tomáš Korbař to see what they want to do? The fact that neither guile-3 and the other packages have been 'moribund' says that maybe there are other issues which need help on. [I mean 2020 has been a crap year for a LOT of people.. people have a lot of other things to worry about than a scheme derivative.] -- Stephen J Smoogen. I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on BBS... time to reboot. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
