Re: Guile & Fesco requiring package maintenance work

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 03:31:21PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > [...]  I agree that enabling it for the fesco project would be
> > good. It's probably insufficient, though. When the meeting chair sends
> > the agenda, adding the owners on cc or bcc so that they get reminded
> > of time/location/etc is important.
> 
> Since this gets overlooked with some regularity, a mechanical way of
> getting notified / invited to relevant fesco meetings should be a
> priority.

well, we have: 

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FESCo_meeting_process

"Make sure to check with and invite stakeholders who may not be CC'd in
the issue. Consider deferring issue if stakeholders have not had
adequate notice and are not available for discussion."

Perhaps it should be more explicit in how to "check with and invite"?

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux