* Stephen John Smoogen: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 11:45, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> * Stephen John Smoogen: >> >> > C) This proposal was reviewed and pushed again for F35 even if it is >> > 'too late' because well this just doesn't sit well. >> >> This doesn't make sense to me—what is “this proposal”, and how it was >> “pushed again”? >> > > Sorry.. my brain seems to have rebooted while typing that. > > 1. I thought I was responding to the discussion on > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2558 > 2. It should have read " This proposal ( > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2558 ) needs to be reviewed and pushed > again for F35 even if it is 'too late' for proposals. The original > decision just doesn't sit well with me in telling people to do > things." > > I hope that clarifies things. Indeed. I originally read it as opposition to re-submission of the change (and I could see that submitting a proposal over and over again until it passes could be a problem). Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
