Re: F35 Change: libmemcached-awesome (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:50:18AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libmemcached-awesome

== Summary ==
Switch from libmemcached to libmemcached-awesome

== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]]
* Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org

== Detailed Description ==

libmemcache 1.0.18 was released in February 2014, so hasn't received
an update for 7 years.

libmemcache-awesome is a fork providing same libraries, tools with
API/ABI compatibility.

== Benefit to Fedora ==

Rely on a maintained project.



== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Check Koschei status. Test with latest version to
ensure compatibility. Work with upstream on bug fixing. Needed mass
rebuild (C extensions) done by change owner.

* Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Release engineering:
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== How To Test ==

* install and play with your application

== User Experience ==

Developers and system administrators will have the great benefit or
running a maintained library.


== Dependencies ==

All php-* packages (and some *-php)

== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism: Drop not compatible packages.
* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

== Documentation ==

* [https://awesomized.github.io/libmemcached/ Upstream documentation]


The change proposal indicates this is a drop-in API replacement
project, but will this introduce a new package named
'libmemcached-awesome' and we let libmemcached go out to pasture?  Or
is this changing the Source0 of the libmemcached package to just use
this new upstream?

If the former, will the new package provide proper Provides/Conflicts
against the existing libmemcached package or are there plans to allow
both to be installed at the same time?

Thanks,

--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux