On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 12:29 PM David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:50:18AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/libmemcached-awesome > > > >== Summary == > >Switch from libmemcached to libmemcached-awesome > > > >== Owner == > >* Name: [[User:Remi| Remi Collet]] > >* Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org > > > >== Detailed Description == > > > >libmemcache 1.0.18 was released in February 2014, so hasn't received > >an update for 7 years. > > > >libmemcache-awesome is a fork providing same libraries, tools with > >API/ABI compatibility. > > > >== Benefit to Fedora == > > > >Rely on a maintained project. > > > > > > > >== Scope == > >* Proposal owners: Check Koschei status. Test with latest version to > >ensure compatibility. Work with upstream on bug fixing. Needed mass > >rebuild (C extensions) done by change owner. > > > >* Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) > >* Release engineering: > >* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) > >* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) > > > > > >== Upgrade/compatibility impact == > >N/A (not a System Wide Change) > > > >== How To Test == > > > >* install and play with your application > > > >== User Experience == > > > >Developers and system administrators will have the great benefit or > >running a maintained library. > > > > > >== Dependencies == > > > >All php-* packages (and some *-php) > > > >== Contingency Plan == > >* Contingency mechanism: Drop not compatible packages. > >* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change) > >* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change) > > > >== Documentation == > > > >* [https://awesomized.github.io/libmemcached/ Upstream documentation] > > > > The change proposal indicates this is a drop-in API replacement > project, but will this introduce a new package named > 'libmemcached-awesome' and we let libmemcached go out to pasture? Or > is this changing the Source0 of the libmemcached package to just use > this new upstream? > > If the former, will the new package provide proper Provides/Conflicts > against the existing libmemcached package or are there plans to allow > both to be installed at the same time? >From what I can tell, you can't have both installed in parallel, so I think I'd prefer to see the Source0 in libmemcached change to the fork rather than introducing a new source package and complicating things. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
