On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:36:40AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >Dear maintainers. > > > >Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > >will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before > >branching (August 2021). > > > >Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > > > > > >The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 32. > > > >This report is based on dist tags. > > > >Packages collected via: > >https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb > > > > > >If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > >If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, > >please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo > >approval for that. > > > >If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > > > > Package (co)maintainers Latest build > >================================================================================ > >cardpeek kalev Fedora 32 > > Has ASSIGNED bugzillas since Fedora 33: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863309 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923409 > > >percona-xtrabackup slaanesh, slankes Fedora 32 > > Has a MODIFIED bugzilla since Fedora 33: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865206 > > >php-opencloud-openstack lcts Fedora 32 > > Has CLOSED (but not fixed) and NEW bugzillas since Fedora 33: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865221 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923428 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977297 > > >proxyfuzz psklenar Fedora 32 > > Had no bugzillas because it failed to build even the SRPM. > I've opened one quite recently: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974327 > > >radamsa huzaifas, mrniranjan Fedora 32 > > Has no bugzillas, the mass rebuilds builds never finished (they hang for days) It'd be sad to lose radamsa from the distro. I pushed a snapshot build. > >sugar-view-slides callkalpa, chimosky, pbrobinson, Fedora 31 > > tuxbrewr > > Fails to install, fails to build since Fedora 32, was exempted from > this policy last time with a promise of a fix. > > Has many bugzillas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=sugar-view-slides&product=Fedora > > >zram pbrobinson Fedora 32 > > This might not actually be a FTBFS, but simply a package that has > not been built in 1.5 years. > It has a noautobuild file with: > > > it's a couple of bash scripts, no need for rebuilds > > I tend to disagree with that statement. The rebuilds are useful for: > > - new possible dependency generators > - new possible buildroot policy scripts > - new RPM/buildsystem features (compression, content signatures, etc.) > > I think it's worth rebuilding it at least once in a year. It's a case of "save a little bit of work for the machine by generating more work for the humans" ;) Yeah, a bad trade-off. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
