On 30. 06. 21 1:32, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 35 approximately one week before branching (August
2021).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 32.
This report is based on dist tags.
Packages collected via:
https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb
If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me
know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
Package (co)maintainers Latest build
================================================================================
cardpeek kalev Fedora 32
Has ASSIGNED bugzillas since Fedora 33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1863309
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923409
percona-xtrabackup slaanesh, slankes Fedora 32
Has a MODIFIED bugzilla since Fedora 33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865206
php-opencloud-openstack lcts Fedora 32
Has CLOSED (but not fixed) and NEW bugzillas since Fedora 33:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1865221
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1923428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1977297
proxyfuzz psklenar Fedora 32
Had no bugzillas because it failed to build even the SRPM.
I've opened one quite recently:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974327
radamsa huzaifas, mrniranjan Fedora 32
Has no bugzillas, the mass rebuilds builds never finished (they hang for days)
sugar-view-slides callkalpa, chimosky, pbrobinson, Fedora 31
tuxbrewr
Fails to install, fails to build since Fedora 32, was exempted from this policy
last time with a promise of a fix.
Has many bugzillas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=sugar-view-slides&product=Fedora
zram pbrobinson Fedora 32
This might not actually be a FTBFS, but simply a package that has not been
built in 1.5 years.
It has a noautobuild file with:
> it's a couple of bash scripts, no need for rebuilds
I tend to disagree with that statement. The rebuilds are useful for:
- new possible dependency generators
- new possible buildroot policy scripts
- new RPM/buildsystem features (compression, content signatures, etc.)
I think it's worth rebuilding it at least once in a year.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
