Re: question about RedHat/Fedora and the GPL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/7/05, Curtis Doty <Curtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jeff Pitman wrote:
> 
> >On Tuesday 07 June 2005 01:16, Curtis Doty wrote:
> >
> >
> >>It sure would be nice if the Red Had specfile maintainers took us
> >>into consideration. .. Those of us who don't have access to the Red
> >>Hat IP known as beehive. .. And have no problem managing our own
> >>parallel build environments.
> >>
> >>
> >www.bugzilla.com
> >
> >
> So noted as a second. And dutifuly entered here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159696
> 
> And thanks for the link to the gphoto of a goofy Volkswagen. I'm sure
> it's owner is proud. :-p
> 

hehe.. no no.. beehive isnt a factor in providing rpms... but we will
just patch in beehive support and intergrate beehive into the build
process, but then claim it has nothing to do with GPL and is free from
the T&C of the GPL...

ta

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux