Re: question about RedHat/Fedora and the GPL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arjan van de Ven wrote:

yes. All the scripts needed to control the compilation and installation
of the executable is in the src.rpm perfectly fine.
I find myself always adding something like:

--- kernel-2.6.spec     2005-05-17 16:50:40.000000000 -0700
+++ kernel-2.6gk.spec   2005-05-30 18:58:15.000000000 -0700
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
%define sublevel 11
%define kversion 2.6.%{sublevel}
%define rpmversion 2.6.%{sublevel}
-%define rhbsys %([ -r /etc/beehive-root -o -n "%{?__beehive_build}" ] && echo || echo .`whoami`) +%define rhbsys %([ -r /etc/beehive-root -o -n "%{?__beehive_build}" ] && echo || echo .`whoami`@`hostname -s`)
%if %{FC3}
%define release %(R="$Revision: 1.27 $"; RR="${R##: }"; echo ${RR%%?})_FC3%{rhbsys}
%endif

It sure would be nice if the Red Had specfile maintainers took us into consideration. .. Those of us who don't have access to the Red Hat IP known as beehive. .. And have no problem managing our own parallel build environments.

../C

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux