Re: When is pappl going to be good enough to replace cups?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 08:52:13PM -0400, PGNet Dev wrote:
> Endless theoretical discussions ... Interesting, but _is_ there 
> real-world, end-user doc available for installing and using papp-et-al 
> on Fedora, today?  A "do this now" for end users?  TBH, I'm unclear 
> (and no, I haven't gone digging ...)

The short answer -- no, there isn't anything like thet yet.

For PAPPL specifically, there won't ever be, because it is essentially a 
library/framework to be used by printer-specific stuff.

> Admittedly, PS drivers are buggy-to-useless, and NONE of the "toner 
> level" reporting seems attached to reality in any way.

For these old Postscript-capable HPs, there's the new 'ps-printer-app' 
(not yet packaged in Fedora) which will allow you to supply the PPD and 
everything should JustWork(tm).

For native PCL, there's currently the 'hp-printer-app', but IIUC it's 
meant more as a demonstration of PAPPL than anything comprehensive.

When Gutenprint is finally mashed together with PAPPL, it'll bring along 
comprehensive PCL4/5/5c support.  There are probably plans afoot to do 
the same with hplip, which will also result in comprehensive PCL 
support.

> If any of that^^ ceases to function, then that'll be a problem. 

Absolutely!  

I don't believe anyone is seriously advocating for retiring the 
status-quo "Legacy CUPS" driver model until (at minimum) the major 
printer driver families have been PAPPLized.

> OTOH, If papp-future _at_the_very_least_ maintains that^^ 
> functionality through legacy wrappers, then I have zero concerns.

I believe this exact scenario is planned as the final catch-all option.

Just to be clear, when this Printer Application-only vision was first 
announced I was probably the most vocal skeptic in the room. Since then, 
the Openprinting folks have made consistent progress, addressing 
concerns, and filling in the missing pieces.  They're working very, very 
hard to ensure printing continues to work... at least as well as it ever 
did, heh.

(I've beeen around long enough to remember similar arguments being made 
 about a new shiny upstart called CUPS over lpr[ng] and printcap. And 
 look where we are today...)

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy			      pizza at shaftnet dot org (email&xmpp)
                                      @pizza:shaftnet dot org   (matrix)
High Springs, FL                      speachy (freenode)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux