On 5/20/21 12:13 PM, Ron Olson wrote: > If I may, I think the issue is right there in the name: Fedora CoreOS. The Fedora name brings some expectations and it seems CoreOS, by its nature, can’t be at parity with the other Fedora flavors and that leads to confusion. I can attest that I was surprised when I learned Fedora CoreOS didn’t support cgroups v2 and that confused me; it’s Fedora, of course it would have the latest-n-greatest. One clarification here.. It does support cgroups v2, it's just not enabled by default. It's just a kernel parameter. Specifically for cgroups v2, the default is changing here in the next month. So FCOS will default to cgroups v2. We're trying to make sure users have a good experience. Docker users are a big part of that. Changing the default before Docker supported cgroups v2 was really not an option for us at the time. > > I used CoreOS before it bought by RH, and I could accept whatever limitations it had because there were no expectations. Here’s a specialized distro that does things in its own way. > > I’m guessing this is laughably not possible, but I’m going to suggest anyway that maybe it be renamed either back to simply “CoreOS” or something new like “Bowler” or whatever that indicates that it is its own special thing and expectations can be set accordingly. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
