Re: What next?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 15:12 -0400 schrieb Jeff Spaleta:
> On 6/5/05, Michael Tiemann <tiemann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I even think that your suggestion
> > of a one-time-for-now 9 month cycle could make sense.  
> 
> +1

-1

The whole world (and the press also) knows "Suse and Fedora usually ship
in April/May and September/October". Okay, with FC4 we're a bit late.
But it would IMHO be nice if it could stay this way. 

And with a 9 Month schedule this time we would have the end of the beta
phase around/after Chrismas. And (if we go back to 6 month after that)
the next one during the summer holidays. I suspect that will decrease
testing (and work spend just before release).

And we'll get a lot of "gnome 2.{12,14} is out since three month --
where are Fedora packages."

Just my 2 cent

CU
thl

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux