On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 15:23 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > But the stuff that's required to hit an 18 month target is just Night And Day > > different. > > > I wasn't recommending an 18 month target, I was saying that I thought > lengthening the fc devel cycle would help us get some things done that > we just haven't had the time to do. I may be totally off base here, but I think you misunderstood what Michael was talking about. I *think* he is referring to RHEL being on the 18 month target, which means Fedora basically does 3 releases to meet the goals they set for RHEL, which sort of is an 18 month target as well, or 3 *3 month* targets to get it there? *shrug*, just trying to help understand. So throw this email out the window if it's not correct :P -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Everything is difficult before it's easy!" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
